chimpanzees – Christian Life Coaching Franklin Tennessee

This was a major accomplishment, considering how intelligent design proponents or anyone who critiques evolution is treated in mainstream media. Source

25Jun 2025 by Post

Why Is the 1 Percent Myth So Beloved?

1 percent myth, Andrew McDiarmid, bonobos, Bornean orangutans, Casey Luskin, chimpanzees, chimps, DNA, Evolution, genetics, genomes, gorillas, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, Junk DNA, Nature (journal), Pan paniscus, reality, Research, siamangs, Smithsonian Institution, statistics, Sumatran orangutans

When a belief conflicts with common sense present-day reality, it is usually upholding an irrational value. Source

14Jun 2025 by Post

Challenged on the “1 Percent” Myth, Smithsonian Gives a Meaningless Non-Answer

1 percent myth, chimp genome, chimpanzees, chimps, common ancestry, common design, computer programmers, Discovery Institute, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Shenk, Evan Eichler, Evolution, Evolution News, geneticists, genetics, human genome, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, National Museum of Natural History, Nature (journal), signage, Smithsonian Institution, Supplemental Data, taxpayers, University of Washington

Note to President Trump: I find this pretty disrespectful to the people who pay the bills at the Smithsonian. Source

27May 2025 by Post

Letter to the Smithsonian: Correct Your Signage on Human-Chimp Genetic Similarity!

1 percent myth (series), Casey Luskin, chimpanzees, differential, DNA, Evolution, gap divergence, genetic code, genetic difference, genomes, Gorilla gorilla, gorillas, human exceptionalism, Human Origins, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, Intelligent Design, National Museum of Natural History, Nature (journal), orangutans, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii, primates, Progressive Cactus, signage, single nucleotide variation, Smithsonian Institution, Supplemental Data, telomere, University of Johannesburg

Unfortunately, the 1 percent myth is promulgated as fact at, among other places, the nation's own Smithsonian Institution. Source

23May 2025 by Post

Breaking: New Study Shatters the 1 Percent Human-Chimp Difference Myth

1 percent myth, American Museum of Natural History, Casey Luskin, chimpanzees, chimps, common decent, de novo, Emily Reeves, Evolution, human exceptionalism, human genome, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, ID The Future, National Geographic, new york, order of magnitude, Podcast, Science (journal), Science Reporting, Scientific American

The 1 percent statistic has become so widely cited and accepted that it could be considered an “icon of evolution.” Source

21May 2025 by Post

Fact Check: New “Complete” Chimp Genome Shows 14.9 Percent Difference from Human Genome

ape genomes, bonobos, Bornean orangutans, chimpanzees, chimps, deletions, DNA, Evolution, gap difference, gap divergence, gene duplications, genomes, Gorilla gorilla, gorillas, human genome, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, insertions, Kateryna Makova, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Nature (journal), order of magnitude, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii, Science Reporting, short nucleotide variations, siamangs, Smithsonian Institution, SNVs, Sumatran orangutans, Supplemental Data

I suspect that this radical finding has implications — for human exceptionalism and more — that people will be discussing for a long time. Source

20May 2025 by Post

Bombshell: New Research Overturns Claim that Humans and Chimps Differ by Only 1 Percent of DNA

burying the lede, chimpanzees, common ancestry, David Klinghoffer, DNA, Evolution, gap difference, genomes, human exceptionalism, Human Origins and Anthropology, humans, Icons of Evolution, Jonathan Wells, Kevin Williamson, Museum of Natural History, National Review, Nature (journal), science journalism, Smithsonian Institution, statistics, Supplementary Data, zombies

This finding should be major news in the science world, yet those involved don’t seem interested in highlighting the discovery. Source

Category: chimpanzees