anger,
David Klinghoffer,
ENCODE,
ENCODE scientists,
Endogenous retroviruses,
ERVs,
Evolution,
Francis Collins,
Human Genome Project,
Intelligent Design,
Internet,
Jonathan McLatchie,
Jonathan Wells,
Junk DNA,
Long Story Short,
pseudogenes,
Richard Dawkins,
Rob Sheldon,
rudeness,
science stopper,
The Greatest Show on Earth,
“selfish gene”
Of course, die-hard evolution defenders were not going to take these major shifts in thinking about “junk DNA” sitting down. Source
Conservation of Information,
David Thomas,
Design Inference,
displacement fallacy,
Eugenie Scott,
Evolution,
evolutionary computing,
fitness,
Intelligent Design,
mathematics,
mount improbable,
Nature (journal),
Peter Robinson,
pigeonhole principle,
Richard Dawkins,
shell game,
simulation,
Tesla,
The Blind Watchmaker,
Thomas Ray,
Thomas Schneider,
William Shakespeare
In a shell game, an operator places a small object, like a pea, under one of three cups and then rapidly shuffles the cups to confuse observers. Source
birds,
Brian Gardiner,
Charles Darwin,
convergent adaptations,
Darwinism,
dinosaurs,
Dromaeosauridae,
Evolution,
Fossil Friday (series),
Green River Formation,
Haematothermia,
Intelligent Design,
John Ray,
mammals,
Nahmavis grande,
paleontology,
Philippe Janvier,
physiology,
pterosaurs,
Richard Dawkins,
Richard Owen,
spermatozoa,
synapsid,
Søren Løvtrup,
warm-blooded animals,
Wyoming
How do popularizers of Darwinism such as Richard Dawkins react? Unsurprisingly, they just ignore the evidence. Source
biology,
Bret Weinstein,
Cambrian Explosion,
Charles Darwin,
cutting edge,
DarkHorse Podcast,
Darwinian evolution,
Darwinism,
Darwinists,
David Gelernter,
Evolution,
evolutionary biology,
Heather Heying,
Intelligent Design,
Jerry Coyne,
Jesus,
Richard Dawkins,
Stephen Meyer,
The Selfish Gene,
whale sharks,
Yale University
Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying are well-known evolutionary biologists (and husband and wife) with a podcast. Source
abrupt transitions,
Avalon explosion,
Big Bangs,
Cambrian Explosion,
Cambridge,
Creativity,
Darwinian evolution,
David Berlinski,
Ediacaran biota,
England,
Evolution,
explosions,
flowering plants,
fossil record,
Gerd Müller,
gradualism,
Günter Bechly,
Intelligent Design,
jumps,
Neo-Darwinism,
paleontology,
predictions,
revolutions,
Richard Dawkins,
Royal Society,
saltations
You’ve heard that challenge a million times. But as paleontologist Günter Bechly explains, the opposite is true. Source
atheists,
Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
Brian Miller,
Casey Luskin,
Center for Science and Culture,
Christianity,
Conversion,
depression,
Discovery Institute Press,
emotion,
Evolution News,
Faith & Science,
faith and science,
Father Martin Hilbert,
Feelings,
Günter Bechly,
Intelligent Design,
John West,
Jonathan McLatchie,
Muslims,
new york,
Richard Dawkins,
self-hatred,
Somalia,
Stephen Meyer,
suicide,
William Dembski
Here was a believer, a very thoughtful one, who knew nothing about whether the God hypothesis can be defended on objective grounds. Source
Big Bang,
Casey Luskin,
chimps,
fossils,
genus Homo,
geologists,
hominids,
human exceptionalism,
Human Origins,
human race,
humans,
ID The Future,
Intelligent Design,
Podcast,
Richard Dawkins
Survive. Reproduce. Repeat. Is that all we’re here for? Some people make this claim. Source
Atheism,
Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
Christianity,
Colin Wright,
Comfort,
cosmic designer,
design hypothesis,
Evolution,
Faith & Science,
gender,
intelligence,
Intelligent Design,
Manhattan Institute,
mathematics,
morality,
Muslims,
New Atheists,
nobility,
physics,
Return of the God Hypothesis,
Richard Dawkins,
scientific hypothesis,
Stephen Meyer,
stories,
theism,
Twitter,
universe
This is a remarkable response, granting the premise of arguments for intelligent design like those of Stephen Meyer. Source
Arkansas,
Cambridge University Press,
Christianity,
Dallas,
Darwinism,
David Hull,
Debating Design,
Evolution,
Foundation for Thought and Ethics,
Intelligent Design,
John Dominic Crossan,
Jon Buell,
Michael Ruse,
N. T. Wright,
Phillip Johnson,
Richard Dawkins,
Sam Harris,
Subboor Ahmad,
The End of Faith,
The God Delusion,
The Root of All Evil?
Paradoxically, he was ardent in his Darwinism, mild in his atheism, and fair-minded to intelligent design. Source