The Challenge from Jason Rosenhouse

biologists, debate, email, engineers, Evolution, evolutionary biologists, Guide to Reading Jason Rosenhouse (series), Intelligent Design, Jason Rosenhouse, Jerry Coyne, Leo Kadanoff, mathematicians, peer-reviewed literature, physics, The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism, University of Chicago, YouTube videos
"The response would be a lot chillier if they tried the same arguments in front of audiences with the relevant expertise." Is that so? Source
Read More

Why Systems Biologists Now Assume Life Is Optimally Designed

"poor design", bioinformatics, biological structures, biologists, biosphere, Dan Graur, ENCODE, engineers, Eva Balsa-Canto, Evolution, fitness landscape, human body, Human Errors, human genome, Intelligent Design, Julio R. Banga, Junk DNA, knee, Living with Darwin, Nathan Lents, Nikolaos Tsiantis, optimality, pelvis, Philip Kitcher, scientific materialism, teleology, whales, Wikipedia
Purported examples of poor design usually represent opinions resulting from armchair critics’ limited understanding of the technical literature. Source
Read More

Meyer: Did a Student’s Challenging Question to Dean Kenyon Spark the Modern ID Movement?

biological information, biologists, Cambridge University, chemical evolution, chemical forces, Dallas, Dean Kenyon, DiscoveryU, DNA, Education, Intelligent Design, origin of life, San Francisco State University, self-organization, Stephen Meyer
Stephen Meyer discusses theories, like Kenyon’s, that seek to account for the information in DNA by reference to chemical forces alone. Source
Read More

The Myth of Behe “Refuted”

A Mousetrap for Darwin, Adam and Eve, atheists, biochemistry, biologists, chloroquine, City University of New York, Columbia University, Concordia University, critics, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, Evangelical Christians, Evolution, evolutionists, friendship, Intelligent Design, Joshua Swamidass, Justin Brierley, Kitzmiller v. Dover, mutations, Nathan Lents, op-ed, refutation, Science (journal)
Once again, Darwinists seek to avoid an argument by using clever talk, giving the false impression of a scientist, Behe, who brushes away challenges. Source
Read More