18Apr 2026 by Post

Who Speaks for God? Darwinists Do, Apparently

biologists, Center for Science and Culture, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Darwinian evolution, Darwinists, Evolution, evolutionary theory, Faith & Science, Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins, scientific reasoning, Stephen Dilley, Theodosius Dobzhansky, theology
Center for Science and Culture Senior Fellow Stephen Dilley explores this curious phenomenon in his talk at the 2025 Dallas Conference on Science and Faith. Source
Read More
17Apr 2026 by Post

Brian Miller: From Physics to Filmmaking

Brian Miller, colleagues, cosmos, Daniel Reeves, Eric Esau, Evidence, experts, family, filmmakers, films, friends, Intelligent Design, leaders, Neighbors, pastors, physics, Return of the God Hypothesis, scientific discoveries, scientific reasoning, Stephen Meyer, teachers, technical advisor, The Story of Everything, universe
Scientific arguments can take a long time to percolate through the culture, especially when the scientific establishment and media push another narrative. Source
Read More
17Apr 2026 by Post

What is the Story of Everything? with Dr. Stephen C. Meyer

Christian Apologetics, Christianity, Dr. Frank Turek, Intelligent Design, morality, origin of life, origin of universe, philosophy, Podcast, purpose of life, religion, Stephen C. Meyer, theology
Where did the universe come from? How did life begin? And is there a purpose behind it all? If you’re looking for the answers to life’s BIGGEST questions, look no further than ‘The Story of Everything‘, coming soon to a theatre near you APRIL 30th-MAY 6th. Inspired by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer’s most recent book, ‘The Return of the God Hypothesis‘, this film will take you on a cinematic journey through the cosmos, uncovering signs of intentional design—from the laws that govern galaxies to the intricate code of DNA—revealing a consistent signature woven throughout nature and existence itself. This week, Dr. Stephen C. Meyer joins Frank on the program to discuss some of the many highlights from the film while answering questions like: How do you show that God exists…
Read More
17Apr 2026 by Post

The Living Nano-Factory: Darwinists Ignore the Ultimate Information Enigma

alien intelligence, alphabetic letters, amino acids, biology, coded instructions, Contact (movie), DNA, Ellie Arroway, Evolution, extraterrestrial life, Francis Crick, information, information enigma, intelligent agent, Intelligent Design, James Tour, James Watson, material universe, molecular biology, molecules, prime numbers, protein synthesis, Scientific community, Stephen Meyer, The Story of Everything
Information and orderly processes don’t happen by accident any more than a factory production line organizes itself out of unassembled constituent parts. Source
Read More
15Apr 2026 by Post

5 Biblical Men Every Boy Should Know

4. Is the NT True?, Amy Davison, Apologetics, Bible characters, Biblical manhood, Boy Mom, Christianity, Gospel, MamaBearApologetics, Raising Boys
A Twitter post caught my eye a while back from a brother in Christ who was fed up with his church’s take on biblical manhood. Manhood, it was implied, was a burly trinity of plaid, football, and Clint Eastwood. As if the lost 11th commandment was: Thine beard shall be like Jesus, and thou shalt give John the Baptist a run for his money with thine outdoorsman skills!  I know a lot of guys who would have no problem with this definition of manhood. But our guy on Twitter felt out of place, at church and even with his own manly identity. Mamas, our boys have been fed a line or two about what it means to be a man. Just like our girls (read about women your girls should know here),…
Read More
14Apr 2026 by Post

Is the Bible HATE Speech? Plus Q&A

Bible and morality, Christian Apologetics, Christian Worldview, Christianity, Culture and Christianity, Dr. Frank Turek, Free speech vs hate, LGBTQ debate, morality, philosophy, Podcast, religion, theology
Is disagreement hate? And what about speaking out against certain sexual behaviors, like LGBTQ? Does that make you a mentally unstable person? A Canadian “hate speech” bill is currently causing concern as critics warn it could chill religious speech and expose some people to prosecution for simply quoting the Bible. Meanwhile, basketball player Jaden Ivey is promptly fired from the Chicago Bulls for stating that Pride Month celebrates “unrighteousness” as other NBA players commit serious felonies (including physically harming others) without serious repercussions. What’s up with that? Pack your patience during the midweek episode as Frank addresses these and many other questions including: What is the irony behind Liberal Party MP Marc Miller’s statements in regards to Bible passages in Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Romans? Where does our identity come from?…
Read More
13Apr 2026 by Post

Contest of Cosmic Stories “Isn’t a Fair Fight”

aneurysm, Artemis II, astronauts, astronomers, Bethel McGrew, Book of Nature, Carl Sagan, cosmology, cosmos, earth, Faith & Science, history of science, Johannes Kepler, nihilism, paywall, planetary motion, planets, Psalms, Richard Dawkins, scientific evidence, space, stars, Stephen Meyer, The Story of Everything, theologians, universe, Victor Glover, Voyager 1, Wall Street Journal
As Bethel McGrew notes, the tradition of seeing the stars, planets, and the rest of space as pointing to a creator has a distinguished scientific history. Source
Read More
13Apr 2026 by Post

Arguing from the Extremes

1. Does Truth Exist?, Apologetics, Argumentation, Christianity, fallacy, FreeThinkingMinistries.com, Gospel, logic, Phil Kallberg, “arguing from extremes”
There is a very common type of fallacious reasoning that I have termed arguing from the extremes. Once you see this, you’ll notice that it’s everywhere in our society and especially political discourse. Roughly speaking it’s the idea that one or an extremely small number of counter examples disproves a whole theory. This is simply not how to do good reasoning. If you see x follow y 1,000 times you will rightly conclude that there is some type of causal link between x and y. If on try 1,001, x does not follow y, that should give you pause, but it shouldn’t prompt you to conclude that your established theory (x follows y) needs to be completely thrown out.[1] That would be stupid. But a lot of people do reason like this. So, for example, it has…
Read More