C. W. Howell in Context: A Brief History of Histories

Barbara Forrest, C. W. Howell, Center for Science and Culture, Christianity, Creationism’s Trojan Horse, Darwin Strikes Back, Designer Science, Designer Science (series), Doubts About Darwin, Dover trial, Edward Humes, Evolution, Gordy Slack, IDEA Center, Intelligent Design, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Lauri Lebo, Michael Behe, Monkey Girl, novel arguments, Paul R. Gross, PhD thesis, preconceptions, Scientific consensus, scientific papers, scientism, The Battle Over the Meaning of Everything, The Devil in Dover, Thomas Woodward
One positive aspect: Howell rightly observes that some other would-be histories of ID, especially those by written by critics, are “polemical” and “activist.” Source
Read More

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 1, “Jones Judged Actual ID Theory, Not a Straw Man”

American Civil Liberties Union, bacterial flagellum, Casey Luskin, Darwin Strikes Back, Darwin's Black Box, Design Inference, Evolution, Frequently Asked Questions, intelligent agents, Intelligent Design, intelligent designers, irreducibly complex systems, Judge John E. Jones, Kevin Padian, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Michael Behe, molecular machines, Of Pandas and People, Pennsylvania, philosophy, Scott Minnich, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, supernatural, Ten Myths About Dover, textbooks, The Design Revolution, theology, Thomas Woodward, Time magazine, William Dembski, Witold Walczak
At the end of the day, the ruling by Judge Jones really is not a refutation of intelligent design at all. Source
Read More