Judge John E. Jones – Christian Life Coaching Franklin Tennessee

20Dec 2025 by Post

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 1, “Jones Judged Actual ID Theory, Not a Straw Man”

American Civil Liberties Union, bacterial flagellum, Casey Luskin, Darwin Strikes Back, Darwin's Black Box, Design Inference, Evolution, Frequently Asked Questions, intelligent agents, Intelligent Design, intelligent designers, irreducibly complex systems, Judge John E. Jones, Kevin Padian, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Michael Behe, molecular machines, Of Pandas and People, Pennsylvania, philosophy, Scott Minnich, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, supernatural, Ten Myths About Dover, textbooks, The Design Revolution, theology, Thomas Woodward, Time magazine, William Dembski, Witold Walczak

At the end of the day, the ruling by Judge Jones really is not a refutation of intelligent design at all. Source

18Dec 2025 by Post

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 3, “Intelligent Design Has No Peer-Reviewed Publications”

amicus brief, Annalen der Physik, BioLogos, Cambridge University Press, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., De Revolutionibus, Discovery Institute, Dover trial, Foundation for Thought and Ethics, Francis Collins, Hans Krebs, Harmut Michel, Intelligent Design, Iowa State University, John Angus Campbell, Juan Miguel Campanario, Judge John E. Jones, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Michael Behe, Michael J. Berridge, mutations, Nobel Prize, Of Pandas and People, Origin of Species, peer-reviewed journals, peer-reviewed publications, peer-reviewed research, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, protein science, Robert H. Michell, scientific reasoning, Scott Minnich, Stephen Meyer, Supreme Court, Ten Myths About Dover, The Design Inference, type III secretion system

Unfortunately, Judge Jones got this simple question exactly wrong, giving life to a myth. This alone speaks volumes about his ruling. Source

17Dec 2025 by Post

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 4, “The Dover Ruling Refuted Intelligent Design”

bacteria, bacterial flagellum, blood clots, Bradley Monton, Darwin's Black Box, David Berlinski, dualism, Education, Evolution, Genome Biology and Evolution, Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, Judge John E. Jones, Kenneth Miller, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Laurence Moran, Legal Science (jurisprudence), Manyuan Long, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education, peer-reviewed publications, puffer fish, scientific reasoning, Scott Minnich, Stephen Meyer, The Origin of Species, Tyler Hampton, University of Kentucky, William Dembski, word salad

Expert witnesses like biochemist Michael Behe and microbiologist Scott Minnich testified about how irreducible complexity makes a positive case for design. Source

11Jun 2024 by Post

Darwin Devotion Detector: Take the Test Now

adaptation, atheists, Charles Darwin, chimpanzee, common descent, Darwin Day, Darwin Devotion Detector, eugenics, Evolution, free will, genes, Germany, humanzee, Intelligent Design, J.B.S. Haldane, Jane Austen, Judge John E. Jones, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Kolkata, Love, Meaning, meme theory, natural selection, population growth, purpose, rape, Richard Dawkins, secular saint, United States, value

A tongue-in-cheek questionnaire that nonetheless provides real insight into the extent to which Darwinian ideas have captured our thinking. Source

02Jul 2023 by Post

PBS, Darwin, and Dover: An Interview with Phillip Johnson

Casey Luskin, Center for Science and Culture, Darwin on Trial, Discovery Institute, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Judge John E. Jones, Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial., Kitzmiller v. Dover trial, NOVA, PBS, Phillip Johnson, UC Berkeley

Johnson was one of the only intelligent design proponents interviewed for and included in PBS’s science series NOVA in an episode about the Dover case. Source

14May 2021 by Post

Study Challenges Evolutionary Relationship Between Flagellum and Type III Secretory System

ATP synthase, bacterial flagellum, Cell (journal), Darwin's Black Box, Eduardo P. C. Rocha, Evolution, Howard Ochman, human technology, Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, Jiaxing Tan, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Judge John E. Jones, Kitzmiller v. Dover, last bacterial common ancestor, Michael Behe, molecular machines, motors, Nature Reviews Microbiology, New Scientist, propeller, pumps, rotary engine, Salmonella, Sophie S. Abby, T3SS, University of Arizona

There are various types of flagella, but all function like a rotary engine made by humans. Even non-ID scientists marvel at the complexity of these machines. Source

07Nov 2020 by Post

Michael Behe: Kafka in Dover, Pennsylvania

A Mousetrap for Darwin, computational biology, courts, election, Franz Kafka, hardback, Harrisburg, Intelligent Design, Joshua Swamidass, Judge John E. Jones, Kafkaesque, Kindle, Kitzmiller v. Dover, legal claims, paperback, Pat Flynn, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, The Trial, Washington University

Behe concludes here, “Courts are not good places to discuss ideas.” Yet ID critics continue to cite the Dover case as scientific gospel. Source

02Jun 2020 by Post

Darwin’s Desperation?

"survival of the fittest", appendix, beards, BioEssays, Brois Yeltsin, California Science Center, cell's, censorship, chimpanzees, choking, Christians, Communist Party, conferences, Current Biology, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian theory, Dave Speijer, Dover trial, dysteleology, epiglottis, Evolution, Glenn-Peter Sætre, Heretic, Intelligent Design, J.B.S. Haldane, Judge John E. Jones, Kremlin, lip-smacking, Matti Leisola, methodological naturalism, Michael Behe, Norway, peasants, Richard Dawkins, Richard Sternberg, Social media, speech, Stephen Jay Gould, Summers Seminars, Uncommon Descent, University of Oslo

They used to just ignore us. That worked for many years. Rare appearances of the loathsome words “intelligent design” in scientific journals were quickly squashed, as Richard Sternberg can attest. Occasional payouts to avoid lawsuits, like at the California Science Center, could be dismissed as inconvenient hush money, quickly settled and ignored by the press. Meanwhile, Darwinism marched on, confident and triumphant. Largely unimpeded by any need for debate, evolutionary biologists and psychologists, safe in the accepted custom of methodological naturalism, could spin their just-so stories without fear of contradiction. The media were willing accomplices, keeping the public submissive and quiet, satisfied with the daily illusions pouring forth from the ministry of truth. See how wonderful, elegant, and powerful Darwin’s theory is at explaining everything — from human speech evolving…

Category: Judge John E. Jones