BioEssays – Christian Life Coaching Franklin Tennessee

09Jun 2026 by Post

Evolutionists Need a Refresher Course in Natural Selection

"survival of the fittest", algorithm, Ariel Chipman, Artificial Selection, balancing selection, BioEssays, Cambrian Explosion, co-option, conservation, Darwin Devolves, Dyna Rochmyaningsih, Evolution, Galápagos Islands, gene duplication, genetic drift, genetic mutations, Hugo de Vries, hybridization, introgression, John Sanford, John Templeton Foundation, magic, Matti Leisola, Michael Behe, mount improbable, Mutant Ninja Turtles, natural selection, negative selection, Owen D. Jones, personification, Phillip E. Johnson, polyploidy, process, programming, pterosaur, purifying selection, Richard Lewontin, Robert Hazen, scientific reasoning, Spiderman, stabilizing selection, Stuff Happens Law, subfunctionalization, The Design Inference, Tom Bethell, tuatara, William Dembski, Winston Ewert

Abuses of the concept of natural selection abound not only in science news but in scientific papers in major journals as well. It’s time for a remedial course. Source

03Nov 2025 by Post

A Fake Headline, and a Real One, About DNA

Advanced Science, amino acids, bases, BioEssays, biologists, Chemistry, chromosomes, DNA, domains, exons, gene transcripts, genetics, genome function, genome regulation, geometric code, geometry, Intelligent Design, introns, James Tour, Junk DNA, meteorite, non-B DNA, OSIRIS-REx, packing, packing domains, structural shape, topologically associating domains, Yahoo News

Did you get that? “Cake,” I believe, is supposed to mean life. So obviously on earth we have cake. Source

28Mar 2024 by Post

New Long Story Video Tackles “A Battle of Predictions: Junk DNA”

BioEssays, biologists, biology, Carmen Sapienza, Columbia University, DNA, ENCODE, Evolution, evolutionary biologists, Forrest Mims, Francis Crick, Genome Biology and Evolution, genomes, Intelligent Design, John Bodnar, John Mattick, Jonathan Wells, Journal of Human Evolution, Junk DNA, Laurence Moran, Living with Darwin, Long Story Short, Nature (journal), Nature Methods, Oxford University Press, paradigm shift, Philip Kitcher, predictions, Richard Dawkins, Scientific American, Taylor & Francis, The Greatest Show on Earth, University of Toronto, W. Ford Doolittle, What’s in Your Genome, William Dembski

Something happened in 2012 that changed the entire debate in favor of the ID-based prediction that DNA would be largely functional. Source

16Feb 2024 by Post

Denis Noble in Nature: “Time to Admit Genes Are Not the Blueprint For Life”

agency, BioEssays, biology, blueprint, Brian Miller, Bruce Alberts, Cell (journal), computers, Denis Noble, Dennis Venema, diseases, DNA, Douglas Axe, Evolution, factory, genes, genomes, How Life Works, Intelligent Design, intrinsically disordered proteins, Junk DNA, machines, Nature (journal), organisms, paradigm shift, Philip Ball, proteins, purpose, RNA genes, traits, transformers

In his review, Noble comes right out and says that “Classic views of evolution should also be questioned.” Source

28Nov 2023 by Post

The New Post-Junk-DNA Paradigm of Molecular Biology: RNA Genes

anomalies, BioEssays, biology, brain function, dogma, epigenetic information, Evidence, Evolution, evolutionary theory, function, gene regulation, genes, genetic programming, geochemical anomalies, inheritance, Intelligent Design, John Mattick, Junk DNA, molecular biology, non-coding DNA, paradigm shift, RNA genes, Thomas Kuhn, transgenerational memory

RNA genes have many functions but a large proportion entail gene regulation-related functions that fall within the category of epigenetics. Source

14Nov 2022 by Post

Revising the Linnaean System: Where to Locate Viruses? And the Problem with Mitochondria

alpha-proteobacterium, bacteriophage, BioEssays, Biological Reviews, biology, cellular life, censorship, cytoplasm, Dave Speijer, domain, endosymbiotic hypothesis, eukarya, eukaryogenesis, Evolution, Evolution News, evolutionary theory, free speech, Intelligent Design, Jonathan Wells, Linnaean taxonomy, mitochondria, nucleic acid, protein, replicon, viruses

The venue for a remarkable call for government censorship of science was a peer-reviewed biology journal. Source

22Jun 2022 by Post

From Darwinists, a Shift in Tone on Nanomachines

Adam Watkins, bacterial flagellum, BioEssays, biology, Bruce Alberts, Darwinian pathways, Darwinism, David Hume, Dubai, E. coli, Evolution, flagellar filaments, From Darwinists, Guide to Reading Jason Rosenhouse (series), Harvard University, Howard Berg, Intelligent Design, Jason Rosenhouse, magnetotactic bacteria, molehills, moles, mountains, nanomachines, National Academy of Sciences, Rube Goldberg device, Stone Age, Technology

The shift in tone from then to now is remarkable. What happened to the awe these systems used to inspire? Source

23Nov 2021 by Post

Lessons Not Learned from the Evangelical Debate over Adam and Eve

Adam and Eve, Ann Gauger, Annual Review of Genetics, apes, beta-globin, BioEssays, BioLogos, chimpanzees, Christianity, common ancestry, CRISPR, Dennis Venema, Evangelicals, Evolution, evolutionary theory, Faith & Science, functionality, Genealogical Adam and Eve, gorillas, hominids, Human Origins, In Quest of the Historical Adam, Intelligent Design, Jesus Christ, Joshua Swamidass, Junk DNA, Kenneth Miller, Kitzmiller v. Dover, macaques, methodological naturalism, microRNA response elements, Nature (journal), Nature Reviews Genetics, Ola Hössjer, Paul Nelson, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pseudogenes, RNA (journal), Science Signaling, Springer, Theist Evolution, theology, william lane craig

To his credit, William Lane Craig is among those evangelicals who have been willing to question arguments against Adam and Eve. Source

10Sep 2021 by Post

Luskin at The Federalist — Freedom Is Threatened; Now Will You Listen?

anti-science, Atheism, Ball State University, Big Tech, BioEssays, Canceled Science, Casey Luskin, conspiracy theorists, corporate media, Darwinian theory, eric hedin, Evolution, free speech, information suppression, intellectual freedom, Intelligent Design, Larry Sanger, News Media, power, schools, Soviet Union, survey, The Federalist, United States, University of Michigan, Wikipedia

Critics of Darwinian theory have faced exactly such a campaign — not just recently but going back a couple of decades. Source

01Jan 2021 by Post

Happy New Year! #1 Story of 2020: Biology Journal Demands Government Censorship of ID

Andrew Moore, BioEssays, CDC, censorship, COVID-19, Dave Speijer, democracy, Dennis Prager, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Facebook, Federal Government, free speech, Intelligent Design, Internet, Iran, Italy, Karl Popper, Paul Nelson, regulation, schools, search engines, Social media, South Korea, Thomas Paine, University of Amsterdam, vaccine, White House

What if major technology companies shy from censorship? Then the government should take aggressive action: “Make them.” Source

Category: BioEssays