Abraham,
Aristotle,
biology,
Chance and Necessity,
Chemistry,
Christianity,
Darwinism,
Evolution,
God Hypothesis,
Intelligent Design,
Jaques Monod,
Kansas,
laws of nature,
Mariusz Tabaczek,
materialism,
Modern Synthesis,
molecular biology,
natural processes,
naturalism,
Neo-Darwinism,
Nobel laureates,
paradigm,
physics,
purpose,
René Descartes,
science of purpose,
scientific atheism,
scientism,
St. Thomas Aquinas,
teleology,
telos,
theistic evolution,
Thomistic Aristotelianism,
Thomists
In my most recent post in this series on the science of purpose, I concluded that the proper means of understanding our world requires that we include both purpose and necessity as fundamental elements of any comprehensive framework. I noted that the flagship phrase of 20th-century scientific atheism, as articulated by Nobel laureate Jaques Monod in his book Chance and Necessity, acknowledged necessity but explicitly and intentionally eliminated purpose from scientific dialogue. Now some fifty years later we see that Monod’s paradigm has failed. And that the only possible way of understanding life on earth is to replace chance with purpose. Doing so reverses an epistemological trend stretching back almost 150 years. As such, it is incumbent that we fortify and substantiate the basis for what many would see as a revolutionary new paradigm. That is the goal of this essay. In Read More › Source