09Apr 2026 by Post

Questioning the Science Experts: Is It Even Permitted?

Blaise Pascal, COVID-19, Darwinism, epidemiologists, Evolution, experts, global cooling, global warming, Great Barrington Declaration, House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Intelligent Design, J. Budziszewski, Jonathan Haidt, journalists, medical professionals, Medicine, Pandemic of Lunacy, People for the American Way, political debates, psychologist, schools, scientific reasoning, scientists, University of Texas at Austin, workplaces
If you're trying to do ID science, it's a little bit easier to be intellectually honest, because you have to work harder to make the case for your claim. Source
Read More
03Mar 2020 by Post

Is Joe Blow “Anti-Intellectual”?

AIDS, anti-intellectual, babies, climate change, conception, Darwinists, DDT, eugenics, Evolution, fossil fuels, gender, global cooling, global warming, Jeffrey Epstein, life, malaria, materialism, men, moral purity, Paul Ehrlich, polar bears, polar ice caps, schoolchildren, schools, science consensus, scientists, Skeptics, Steven Novella, truck driver, women, Y2K, Yale University
It’s a common claim among Darwinists that people who question “expert” scientific opinion on such topics as evolution, global warming, and the mind-brain relationship are “anti-intellectual” science deniers. Steven Novella, a Yale neurologist and credulous Darwinist and materialist makes the claim in a recent post: As science-communicators and skeptics we are trying to understand the phenomenon of rejection of evidence, logic, and the consensus of expert scientific opinion.  Ironically, Novella, who considers himself a skeptic, decries the skepticism of people who don’t agree with him. Purity and Consensus How can it be, scientific experts ask, that so many people doubt scientific experts? Novella: There is, of course, no one explanation — complex psychological phenomena are likely to be multifactorial. Decades ago the blame was placed mostly on scientific illiteracy, a…
Read More