In BIO-Complexity, a “How-to-Manual” for Using ID to Guide Scientific Research

Applied Sciences, BIO-Complexity, Brian Miller, Center for Science and Culture, complex specified information, conclusions, designed systems, Emily Reeves, experimental science, experiments, function, George Montañez, historical science, hypotheses, Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, Jonathan McLatchie, Michael Behe, observations, Research, scientific advancements, scientific method, Stephen Meyer, William Dembski
So how does ID use the scientific method? It’s a simple method and it goes like this — all taken from our paper — in four simple steps. Source
Read More

Does This Philosophical View Solve the Problem of Eliminative Materialism?

animism, Baruch Spinoza, consciousness, Edward Feser, electrons, eliminative materialism, explanatory gap, fungi, Hedda Hassel Mørch, Living Cells, materialism, panpsychism, philosophy, Philosophy of Science, plants, principle of sufficient reason, Sam Kimpton-Nye, scientific method
Instead of insisting on the absurdity that nothing is conscious, a scientist can maintain materialism by holding that everything is conscious. Source
Read More

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 7, “Showed ID Is ‘Religious’ and a Form of ‘Creationism’”

Antony Flew, Barbara Forrest, Charles Darwin, Christianity, Cicero, creationism, creator, David DeWolf, Edwards v. Aguillard, Eugenie Scott, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, F. C. S. Schiller, Faith & Science, Fred Hoyle, intelligent agent, intelligent causes, Intelligent Design, Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, John E. Jones, John Haught, John West, Jonathan Witt, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Michael Polanyi, molecular machines, New York Times, Of Pandas and People, Pennsylvania, philosophy, religion, Richard Dawkins, scientific method, Scott Minnich, Supreme Court, Ten Myths About Dover, textbooks, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Thomas Aquinas, William Dembski, William Paley, __featured2
Is intelligent design actually religious? Is it a form of Christianity? We can immediately see that it is not. Source
Read More

Behe, Meyer, and Lennox: Evidence for Design Is Growing

academia, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Evolution, evolutionary theory, Faith & Science, faith and science, Fiesole, ID The Future, Intelligent Design, intelligent designer, intentional design, Italy, John Lennox, mathematics, Michael Behe, Peter Robinson, physical world, Podcast, science, scientific method, Stephen Meyer, Uncommon Knowledge, universe
Peter Robinson sits down with Michael Behe, John Lennox, and Stephen Meyer, three leading voices in science on the case for an intelligent designer. Source
Read More

Stephen Meyer: Evidence of Mind in the Natural World

Christianity, cosmology, Doug Monroe, Faith & Science, fine-tuning, Greek, ID The Future, Intelligent Design, Latin, materialism, miracles, multiverse, Occam's Razor, practice, praxis, Praxis Circle, scientific method, scientific revolution, skepticism, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, theology, Worldview
Can we scientifically detect the activity of a mind behind the universe? Philosopher of science Dr. Stephen Meyer answers this question and more. Source
Read More

Michael Behe, Stephen Meyer, John Lennox: The Evidence for Design Is Growing

academia, cosmology, evolutionary theory, Faith & Science, Fiesole, Hoover Institution, ID The Future, Intelligent Design, Italy, John Lennox, Michael Behe, physical world, Podcast, science, scientific method, Stephen Meyer, Uncommon Knowledge, universe
In a conversation in Fiesole, Italy, three leading thinkers explore the growing problems with modern evolutionary theory and the increasing evidence for design. Source
Read More

The Logic of Design Detection

Archaeology, Complexity, cryptography, design detection, DNA, Evolution, insurance fraud, Intelligent Design, probability, Rosetta Stone, scientific method, Signature in the Cell, specification, The Design Inference, What Is the Evidence for Intelligent Design? (series), William Dembski
Editor’s note: This article is an excerpt from a chapter in the newly released book The Comprehensive Guide to Science and Faith: Exploring the Ultimate Questions About Life and the Cosmos. We are presenting Dr. Meyer’s chapter as a series, in which this is the third post. Find the full series so far here. In The Design Inference, mathematician William Dembski explicates the logic of design detection. His work reinforces the conclusion that the specified information present in DNA points to a designing mind.  Dembski shows that rational agents often detect the prior activity of other designing minds by the character of the effects they leave behind. Archaeologists assume that rational agents produced the inscriptions on the Rosetta Stone. Insurance fraud investigators detect certain “cheating Read More › Source
Read More

What Is Intelligent Design and How Should We Defend It?

biology, Charles Townes, complex specified information, Complexity, DNA, Evolution, human agents, information, intelligence, intelligent causes, Intelligent Design, irreducibly complex systems, machines, molecular machines, Mount Rainier, Mount Rushmore, nature, Nobel laureates, Pacific Northwest, poker, programming, proteins, royal flush, scientific method, South Dakota, U.S. Presidents, volcano
Intelligent design is a scientific theory that holds that many features of the universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause. Source
Read More

Jordan Peterson Springs the Trap of Scientism

Andrew Copson, beauty, Carl Jung, competence, Faith & Science, history of ideas, Holocaust, hydrogen, hydrogen bomb, Intelligent Design, Johannes Kepler, John Lennox, Jordan Peterson, Lawrence Krauss, leprosy, Michael Shermer, myths, Oxford Union, physicists, psychology, religion, Return of the God Hypothesis, Sam Harris, scientific method, scientific revolution, scientism, Stephen Meyer
There’s a gaping God-shaped hole in both Krauss and Peterson’s particular ways of spinning all this. Source
Read More