Blog

New Evidence for Christianity from “God: The Science, The Evidence”

2. Does God Exist?, Apologetics, Arguments for God, BellatorChristi, Brian Chilton, Christianity, Cosmological Argument, design argument, Evolution, God: The Science the Evidence The Dawn of Revolution, Gospel, Michel-Yves Bolloré, Olivier Bonnassies, scientific apologetics
Michel-Yves Bollore’ and Olivier Bonnassies recently wrote a massive treatise defending the existence of God titled God: The Science, the Evidence—The Dawn of a Revolution. Three things are very intriguing about this book. First, neither Bollore nor Bonnassies is a theologian. In fact, both are notable scientists. Bollore serves as a computer engineer and has a master’s and a doctorate from the University of Paris Dauphine. Bonnassies is a graduate of Polytechnique (X86) and the Institut Catholique de Paris with a license in theology. Bonnassies started up numerous businesses over the span of his career. Second, both Bollore and Bonnassies approach the topic of God from a strictly scientific perspective. In their massive tome, they offer many reasons to believe in the God of the Christian faith. Their main argument is that…
Read More

Sweeping Europe, a Pagan Religion Has Daggers Out for This Technology

air conditioning, Associated Press, atonement, carbon emissions, China, Christianity, deaths, Europe, extreme heat, Faith & Science, forgiveness, global warning, guilt, heat wave, Love, monkeys, monotheism, pagan religions, Punishment, red warnings, religion, Sarah Salviander, secular religion, self-preservation, supernatural, Technology, The Story of Everything
A religion that sees humans as merely “an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet” would consider these unnecessary deaths hardly worth noticing. Source
Read More

Bible Expert Reveals Who REALLY Wrote the Gospels?

Bart Ehrman, Christian Apologetics, Christianity, Dr. Frank Turek, Gospel authors, Gospel reliability, Mike Licona, morality, New Testament, philosophy, Podcast, religion, theology
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John really write the Gospels? Or were these books actually anonymous from the beginning? And if they were, what would that mean for Christianity? This week, Frank sits down with New Testament scholar Dr. Mike Licona to unpack his latest debate with Bart Ehrman, one of the world’s best-known New Testament skeptics. What did Mike actually agree with Bart on? And where does he think Bart leans too heavily on speculation instead of the historical evidence? Together, they unpack Bart’s biggest objections and tackle questions like: Why does Bart Ehrman think the Gospels are anonymous, and is he right? Why does it matter who wrote the Gospels? What if the Gospel writers weren’t eyewitnesses? Were the Gospel writers really too uneducated to write the Gospels?…
Read More

On Minds and Machines, Richard Dawkins’s Curious Inconsistency

artificial inteligence, atheists, biology, chatbots, ChatGPT, Claude, Computational Sciences, computing, consciousness, intelligence, Intelligent Design, large language models, living systems, personal identity, philosophy, plagiarists, Richard Dawkins, Technology, UnHerd
If we encounter far more advanced informational technology in living organisms, isn’t the same intuition at least worth considering? Source
Read More

Young Benjamin Franklin: The Goodness of Nature’s Design

A Great Awakening, Angel Studios, Benjamin Franklin, creator, Declaration of Independence, Dominic Sandbrook, endowed by our creator, Faith & Science, Founding Fathers, George Whitefield, infant mortality, Intelligent Design, Jesus, John Adams, John West, Lazarus, providence, Resurrection, Sight & Sound, theistic evolutionists, theology, Tom Holland, Whittaker Chambers, William Paley, Witness, Young Washington
Franklin is famous for his aphorisms and science experiments, but fewer people know he also had a keen interest in theology. Source
Read More

Re-evaluating Lamarck’s Contribution to Evolutionary Thought

adaptations, biology, conscious purposiveness, determinism, Edmund Ware Sinnott, environment, epigenetics, Eva Jablonka, Evolution, Evolution: The History of an Idea, freedom, George Levine, Georges Cuvier, history, history of science, homeostasis, inheritance, instinctive regulation, J. Scott Turner, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Jerry Coyne, Jessica Riskin, Lamarckism, Laurent Larson, Marion Lamb, Motivation, neo-Darwinian synthesis, personality, Peter J. Bowler, Purpose and Desire, regeneration, Skeptic Magazine, teleology, The Power of Life, Yale University
The rehabilitation of Lamarck and the important work of scholars of the past (i.e., Sinnott) and present (i.e., Turner) suggest an interesting conclusion. Source
Read More

Cronin’s Assembly Theory Continues to Perform Its Magic

Assembly Theory, audiences, biochemistry, Brian Miller, cameras, debates, drink, Evolution, evolutionary mechanisms, food, genes, genetics, Harvard University, Intelligent Design, James Tour, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Lee Cronin, magical words, molecules, origin of life, recordings, Research, Rice University, Sara Walker, selection, Videos
Cronin and Walker know what is wrong with origin-of-life research. They’re just afraid of what may be right. Source
Read More

4 Rebuttals to the Muslim Case Against Christianity

4. Is the NT True?, Apologetics, Christianity, christology, debate, Gospel, Islam, Jason Jimenez, Jesus, StandStrongMinistries.Org, Theology and Christian Apologetics, Trinity
What if someone boldly claimed that Jesus himself said He wasn’t God? How would you tackle this intriguing challenge? Let’s dive into this thought-provoking dilemma together. Recently, a viral video titled “Christianity DEBUNKED in Less Than 1 Minute” sparked this very debate presented by a Muslim named Hamza. Essentially, here’s how Hamza frames his argument: If the Father is the only true God, then Jesus cannot be God. If Jesus is God, he must be lying about the Father being the only true God. If Jesus is lying, he cannot be God. Therefore, Jesus debunks Christianity. In this article, I will present four rebuttals to Hamza’s case concerning John 17:3. These responses aim to provide a solid counterargument while offering a reasonable defense and explanation of the divinity of Jesus…
Read More

Frank Addresses Candace Owens’ Conspiracy Theories

Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Christian Apologetics, Christianity, Conspiracy Theories, Dr. Frank Turek, Evidence, Frank Turek, morality, philosophy, Podcast, religion, theology
When did “just asking questions” become enough to convict someone in the court of public opinion? This week, Frank takes a closer look at several claims made by Candace Owens surrounding Charlie Kirk’s murder and asks a simple question: What does the evidence actually show? As he responds to listener emails about the alleged discrepancies in his account of the September 10th events and addresses the so-called CPR contradiction, Frank explains why possibilities, coincidences, and speculation should never be confused with proof. This episode will tackle questions like: Why do minor differences between eyewitness accounts often strengthen rather than weaken credibility? What makes evidence different from speculation, suspicion, or “gut feelings”? How does confirmation bias keep people believing weak arguments? How have logical fallacies fueled conspiracy theories surrounding Charlie’s murder?…
Read More

Biological Codes, and More: Evolutionists Scramble for an Adequate Cause

acetylation, atheists, biological codes, biology, Cambridge University, DNA, DNA tag maps, evolutionists, genetics, George Church, Harvard University, histone tag maps, histones, human cell, Human Genome Project, intelligence, Intelligent Design, iPhone, Life Sciences, materialism, methylation, Michael Behe, Mind and Cosmos, Nanoarchaeum equitans, Oxford University Press, Peter Lipton, phosphorylation, Robert Prinz, specified complexity, Stephen Meyer, supercomputer, Thomas Nagel, uniformitarianism, William Dembski
Much of the information essential to cellular function isn’t editable via random genetic mutations in DNA and is thus inaccessible to the Darwinian mechanism. Source
Read More